![can mozilla thunderbird email reject working with gmail can mozilla thunderbird email reject working with gmail](https://www.howtogeek.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/11/image150.png)
- CAN MOZILLA THUNDERBIRD EMAIL REJECT WORKING WITH GMAIL FULL
- CAN MOZILLA THUNDERBIRD EMAIL REJECT WORKING WITH GMAIL PASSWORD
- CAN MOZILLA THUNDERBIRD EMAIL REJECT WORKING WITH GMAIL WINDOWS 7
CAN MOZILLA THUNDERBIRD EMAIL REJECT WORKING WITH GMAIL PASSWORD
How about per-app passwords, so usage can be tracked and the can be recalled? So normal password will only work with second factor, and where second factor can’t be supplied, special password can be generated on site after logging in to web with two factors. See, all serious providers don’t do this trick: if you enabled twofactor auth, your password is automatically not enough for logging in using any method. Not a good way, unless it can’t be secured at all :) I’ve seen they mentioned same thing in blog post. It’s like adding good new lock on one of adjacent doors, and keeping rusty lock on another the help page I mentioned (please do read it) mentions : This is why it’s FAIL.Īnd their phrase “Two-factor authentication significantly increases the security of webmail access” is just a joke. In their blog post from 2014, they recommend disabling “external programs” support (imap/pop3/smtp protocols) when enabling twofactor, but they’re not automatically disabling it nor even warning user that enabling twofactor is not actually enough to enforce it. Despite two factor auth is exactly what must prevent this. See, if anyone steals your password, he still can access your mail even if you enabled two factor auth.
![can mozilla thunderbird email reject working with gmail can mozilla thunderbird email reject working with gmail](http://cdn.ghacks.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/archive-emails-thunderbird.png)
So it must be required for logging in using any method, otherwise it does not serve the purpose. Right, and this is exactly what is wrong.Ĭonsider that twofactor is implemented to deny malefactors access when they stolen the password (for example, using a keylogger or shoulder surfing). > twofactor auth is for logging into Web mail, most likely. Legitimacy is not legality where indeed “everything which is not forbidden is allowed.” Hawack No Google bashing but I’ve closed the account when the company started “centralizing” data, April 2014 I think. I still would have been approximate in my native language though it would have sounded perhaps a bit less naive :)
![can mozilla thunderbird email reject working with gmail can mozilla thunderbird email reject working with gmail](https://www.lifewire.com/thmb/JcKscem6UCOoQgJKJiytbqVxJR4=/1574x704/filters:no_upscale():max_bytes(150000):strip_icc()/How-to-use-PGP-encryption-with-Mozilla-Thunderbird-Email-client-57f9db2a3df78c690f75d8bc.png)
My rhetoric is also limited by the fact English is not my mother-tongue. But I’ll remember your explanation of the possible worth of a cookie beyond what we often limit it to.
![can mozilla thunderbird email reject working with gmail can mozilla thunderbird email reject working with gmail](https://i.pinimg.com/originals/90/6a/43/906a4321e9a2f459d2698152a70fd2db.png)
This can lead to erroneous beliefs and having them corrected by someone who obviously knows what he’s talking about is one of the great things about blogs and forums.Īnyway the other than my ISP email provider doesn’t require a cookie, even though it is well advanced in terms of security and privacy (). My position is conducted by the lack of technical knowledge together with a strive to enhance as far as possible privacy and security settings. Thanks, LogicDaemon, for this valuable information. If you’re on Linux you’re generally safe, but depends on distro too.
CAN MOZILLA THUNDERBIRD EMAIL REJECT WORKING WITH GMAIL WINDOWS 7
So legitimacy is ok.Īre you using Windows 7 or higher or OSX? Then Google is least of your “privacy intrusions”. > There is, as I see it, no legitimacy to require a cookie for managing email and requiring it is another privacy intrusion.ĪFAIR everything which is not forbidden is allowed. Though Google still supports plaintext auth for existing users of this scheme (with no cookies in that case), Thunderbird uses oAuth2 by default if providers supports it. After receiving token, you can disable cookies again.ītw, both cookies during login and oAuth2 are good thing from security standpoint. > As for Gmail (not used), is this cookie requirement new? First time I hear/read about this issue.Ĭookies used during web phase of oAuth2 login, which is only once unless you (or Google) withdraws token.
CAN MOZILLA THUNDERBIRD EMAIL REJECT WORKING WITH GMAIL FULL
Second, what bothers you? Google (as any other imap/pop3 provider) have full access to contents of your email, and there are lots of headers for high precision tracking. There even no method to use cookies during pop/imap/smtp sessions, and mail viewing will only get/send cookies if you allowed loading external resources (which is epic fail on its own and disabling cookies won’t save you). Thunderbird is my E-mail client but I certainly would not include accounts requiring a cookie to communicate with my emails (TB cookies disabled here).įirst, cookies not required “to communicate with emails”, they only used during oAuth2 web login phase, until Thunderbird receives auth token.